Who were the 3rd Northern Division?

To what extent was this true of the IRA’s 3rd Northern Division?

Estimated reading time: 25 minutes

The Military Service Pensions Collection

Apart from telling us what veterans of the struggle for independence did, the files of the Military Service Pensions Collection (MSPC) also provide valuable insights into who they were. So far, Military Archives have released files relating to 289 former members of the IRA, Cumann na mBan and Na Fianna from Belfast, Antrim and East Down, the three constituent Brigades of the 3rd Northern Division.

Depending on the nature of the application, the files provide varying levels of detail on the occupations of those members and can be broken down into three groups:

  • Application forms for dependent’s allowances or for wound/disability compensation involved explicit questions relating to the member’s occupation and earnings, as these were central to that process.
  • People providing references for applicants under the 1924 Military Service Pensions Act, which was limited to former members of the National Army, had to complete a form that asked, “What was his occupation prior to and subsequent to this period and to what extent was his living interfered with by his work as a Volunteer?”
  • For applications under the 1934 Act, which was widened to include former members of Cumann na mBan and also IRA members who opposed the Treaty, the form did not ask about occupation but instead focussed exclusively on “military operations or engagements or service.”

However, the assessors also interviewed the applicants and the transcripts of these interviews often provide information relating to their employment.

In order to present as broad a picture as possible of the wider republican movement in the 3rd Northern area, Cumann na mBan and Fianna applicants are included here. Antrim and East Down are included to avoid a Belfast urban bias, although there were fewer applications from those areas.

Members of the IRA’s Antrim Brigade, 1920

Social classes

While many of the IRA members ended up having to go on the run and/or took up full-time roles within the organisation, it is their occupation prior to that which is used to classify them. For the purposes of this analysis, a number of social classes have been used, which are broadly similar to those used by the Central Statistics Office, with a couple of additions:

  1. Professional
  2. Managerial
  3. Non-manual
  4. Skilled manual
  5. Semi-skilled manual
  6. Unskilled manual
  7. Not employed
  8. Farming
  9. Not known

The leadership of the 3rd Northern Division in 1921. L-R: an accountant, a railway clerk, a trainee accountant and a school headmaster

Before moving to consider the makeup of the republican movement in the 3rd Northern area, it is necessary to understand the wider context, as shown in the 1911 Census:

Who were they?

The first thing that can be said, using the definitions above, is that the republican movement in the 3rd Northern area was predominantly working class – the four component groups of that class account for 62% of all members (79% excluding not knowns). This percentage increases to 71% of IRA members only (81% excluding not knowns).

Sixty-one were non-manual workers, involved in a wide range of occupations such as teacher, clerk, shop assistant and barman. There were 67 skilled manual workers, making them the largest group, though only by a narrow margin – engineers, electricians, car mechanics and so on. The sizes of these two groups do not match expectations, as each is considerably bigger than might have been anticipated.

However, the two groups that might have been expected to be over-represented, the semi-skilled and unskilled manual workers, were actually relatively small in size. Almost half of the semi-skilled manual group, 18 out of 40, were apprentices, while over half of the unskilled manual workers, 32 out of 54, were labourers.

Gathering flax in county Antrim

It is striking that the occupation of almost two-thirds of the Cumann na mBan members is not known – 44 out of the 68. This begs the question: were they even asked? It might be understandable, given the prevailing social attitudes in the 1930s, that the pension authorities would simply assume that all Antrim Cumann na mBan members worked on the family farms. But in Belfast, where opportunities for women to work outside the home were more plentiful, such an assumption is less forgivable. Among the Belfast women, ten had non-manual jobs such as clerical/secretarial or shop assistant, one worked in a workshop and another in a linen mill on the Springfield Road.

Two IRA members in the sample almost defy classification.

In addition to the ex-servicemen, there was a serving British soldier in the IRA’s Belfast Brigade – Sergeant James Tully, who was a clerk at Victoria Barracks on the Antrim Road:

On account of his military duties, Tully is classed as “non-manual” in the sample.

Officers

While the four working class groups still accounted for the majority (60%) of all officers, there was a marked shift in the balance between those four groups, with a distinct swing away from the skilled and semi-skilled manual groups towards the non-manual group, which became the largest group among the officers.

Taken together, the professional, managerial and non-manual groups accounted for just under half, or 47%, of all officers. But as the semi- and unskilled manual workers still provided more officers than the professionals and managers, it is most accurate to say that the officers of the republican movement were more white-collar – as opposed to more middle class – than the wider membership.

“I was chased from the shipyard”

The events known as the Belfast Pogrom began on 21st July 1920 with the driving out by loyalist mobs of thousands of workers from the shipyards, including both Catholics and so-called “rotten Prods”, socialists and trade unionists who were also viewed as being “disloyal.” The expulsions spread the following day to other notable Belfast employers, especially those in the engineering industry.

Seventeen members of the Belfast IRA worked in the shipyards

Elizabeth Corr (pictured right on this Ormeau Road, Belfast mural) was one of several Cumann na mBan members to lose their jobs

But it was the women of Cumann na mBan who were more likely to explicitly highlight the impact of this period on their livelihoods.

One of the possible reasons why Cumann na mBan applicants were more likely to highlight their loss of livelihood may be that while some women had received the right to vote in 1918, by the time of the pogrom, many Cumann na mBan women were still excluded from the franchise on the grounds of age and/or lack of property qualifications. They may therefore have felt the loss of whatever scraps of economic agency they had achieved more keenly than their IRA counterparts.

Summary and conclusions

In 1920, although a post-war recession was looming and thousands of recently demobilised ex-servicemen were adding to the existing competition for jobs, Belfast was still the leading industrial city in Ireland, with two large shipyards and many other significant companies in the engineering, linen, tobacco and rope-making industries.

The working-class population of the city was therefore much more sizeable than was the case in other cities and towns around Ireland at the time. However, discriminatory employment practices meant that within the Belfast working class, Catholics were disproportionately over-represented at the lower rungs while being under-represented among the skilled manual layer. We would therefore anticipate that membership of republican organisations in the city would be skewed towards the unskilled and semi-skilled manual working class. Adding the membership from the two “country” Brigades of the 3rd Northern Division could be expected to significantly increase the proportion engaged in farming.

Analysis of the sample of 360 members shows that neither was the case.

Almost two-thirds, or 62%, of those in the sample were working class. But the single largest group was the very one in which Catholics were under-represented generally – skilled manual workers, who accounted for 19% of the total; the next-biggest group was drawn from the non-manual working class, another section of the workforce among which Catholics were generally under-represented.

Outside Belfast, farmers and their families were only a minority of republican activists – in both Antrim and East Down, they were outnumbered by those in non-farming occupations.

The officers of the republican movement were also substantially drawn from the working class, with 60% of them from that background. However, this leadership had a distinctively different composition, with a pronounced white-collar, though not middle class, slant. While skilled manual workers were the largest group among the total membership, non-manual workers were by far the biggest among the officers.

With the shipyards being the biggest employers in Belfast, it was perhaps only natural that several IRA members were also employed there. What is surprising is that only two of those made any reference to have been driven from those jobs at the outset of the pogrom; another, working as a railway clerk, was also expelled from his position. Other Belfast IRA members may have been ejected from their jobs, but if they were, they didn’t say so. Given that July 1920 was the defining moment that marked the start of the Pogrom, with a wave of workplace expulsions, it is perhaps extraordinary that so few of the Belfast IRA, over 90% of whom were working, claimed to have been victims of that outbreak.

Being expelled from their jobs was a consequence of their religion. But being active republicans had other consequences.

Members of all three republican organisations also lived with the constant threat of being punished by either the authorities or their employers for their activities.

Several of the Cumann na mBan members in the sample were also arrested and/or interned. But for the women of this organisation, the impact on their employment prospects seemed to be more lasting and more acutely felt. We only know what 17 of them worked at, other than in farming, but ten of those lost their jobs or livelihoods as a result of their activities.

This post was updated on 25th February 2024 with additional information kindly supplied by Margaret Ward.

Leave a comment

References

Leave a comment