Survivors: people who were shot tell their stories

Estimated reading time: 25 minutes

Introduction

The files of the Military Service Pensions Collection (MSPC) have many accounts of the wounds and illnesses suffered by members of the IRA and Cumann na mBan as a result of their republican activities. However, for them, as well as the police and military against whom they were fighting, the risk of being killed or wounded was an occupational hazard which they chose to accept. No such choice was offered to the 415 non-combatants who were killed during the Pogrom.

Although some people were charged with murder and appeared in court, nobody was ever convicted for the killing of any of those 415 people.

Only a small handful of people were charged with the attempted murder of someone during the Pogrom. Their intended victims told the courts what they had gone through – their testimony thus represents an opportunity to tell the stories of people who were shot but survived.

For the purposes of this post, court cases involving policemen who were targeted and the MSPC files of republican casualties have deliberately been excluded; instead, the focus is on ordinary people who were simply going about their everyday lives when someone else tried to kill them.

Sarah Bannon

On 29 March 1921, Sarah Bannon was in her home at 3 New Lodge Road, near its junction with North Queen Street and facing Vere Street on the opposite side of the street; hearing gunshots, she went into the front room to bring two of her children out of the room – she looked out the window:

He was acquitted.

North Queen Street (© National Museum of Northern Ireland, Welch Collection)

Patrick McGurnaghan

One of the Vere Street eyewitnesses who said they had seen Saunders with a revolver was Patrick McGurnaghan – that may have been the reason why he was subsequently targeted eight months later.

On the afternoon of 24 November 1921,

He was found not guilty.

John McArdle

Foundry Street in Ballymacarrett, with a predominantly Catholic end nearer to the Newtownards Road and a mainly Protestant end towards the nearby railway line, was a constant scene of tensions and violent clashes.

Boys gathering stones to use as ammunition (© Corbis)

Patrick Magee said that a group of boys had been playing football in O’Kane’s Lane off Foundry Street – he was the intended victim:

He was found not guilty.

Bridget McCormick

Just over two months later and significantly, a month before Smyth appeared in court for the attempted killing of McArdle, there was another shooting which may have been linked to the first incident – it also happened outside McArdle’s house. On the afternoon of 26 June 1921, 16-year-old Bridget McCormick was standing at the door of that house – she outlined the scene that unfolded in almost slow-motion terms:

She described her state of shock after being shot:

Adam Young

On the night of 25 June 1921, Adam Young was standing at the door of his house in Isabella Street near North Queen Street. He described how John Nolan came out of his house in Moffet Street, which faced Young’s:

According to Young, Nolan had been pursuing a dedicated, if ineffective, vendetta against him for some time:

John Bryson

Nineteen-year-old John Bryson lived in Nelson Street in Sailortown and worked in the shipyard as a heater boy. On the morning of 14 July 1921, there was a sound of an explosion nearby , so he went looking for his younger brother:

Nelson Street, where John Bryson and Francis Ferron lived opposite each other

He was found not guilty.

Jane Theresa O’Reilly

At 8:20 on the morning of 31 August 1921, Jane Theresa O’Reilly, aged 16, was going to her place of work in Little York Street; she was accompanied part of the way by her mother – they parted at the corner of Great Patrick Street, with her mother watching her as she went.

The teenager recalled:

(L) Jane Theresa O’Reilly (Belfast Weekly Telegraph, 10 September 1921); (R) Little York Street, where she was shot (© National Museum of Northern Ireland, Hogg Collection)

Both men were acquitted.

John Walsh

On the afternoon of 2 September 1921, John Walsh, aged 15, was walking down Wall Street in Carrick Hill:

Topping was found not guilty.

Daniel McCambridge

A spirit grocery, looted and burned in the initial outbreak of violence (Illustrated London News, 4 September 1920)

The case of Daniel McCambridge is particularly noteworthy because when Charles Stewart was charged with his attempted murder, members of the IRA appeared in court as witnesses for both the prosecution and the defence.

On Christmas Eve 1921, McCambridge was working as a barman in Kirkpatrick’s spirit grocery in Herbert Street in Ardoyne. The premises were closed but at around 9:30pm, there was a knock on the door and four men entered.

Three of the men ordered a round of ports, then another round; but when they ordered a third round, McCambridge refused to serve them and instead opened the door to let them out:

Patrick McMahon

Like McCambridge, Patrick McMahon also worked in a spirit grocery, but it was one that he owned at 215 York Street. At 6:40pm on 24 November, he was held up and robbed by two armed men. About ten minutes later, he closed the front door of the premises:

York Street (© National Library of Ireland, Lawrence Collection)

David Duncan was charged with the attempted murder of McMahon, but he was subsequently charged with the murder of James McIvor, another spirit grocer in nearby Little Patrick Street who was killed the morning after the attack on McMahon. The trial for the second, more serious charge, was heard first.

After this verdict was returned, a nolle prosequi was entered in relation to the attempted murder of McMahon – the charges were dropped.

John and Michael McMahon

Almost exactly four months after the attempted killing of McMahon, two of his nephews had narrow escapes in the single most notorious incident of the entire conflict. But John and Michael McMahon very likely had to contend with survivors’ guilt in the aftermath of the attack on their family home on the night of 23/24 March 1922, in which their father Owen, their four brothers and the family lodger Edward McKinney were all killed.

The facts of the McMahon family killings are well-known. While John afterwards spoke to reporters from his hospital bed, both he and Michael also made statements to police who arrived to investigate the attack.

Police guarding the McMahon family home the morning after the attack (Illustrated London News, 1 April 1922)

John described the carnage to the police:

“[Spelling and punctuation as per original document] I was sleeping in the room on the second floor with Gerard and Michael, I heard the sound of glass breaking. and I got up and looked down stairs. I saw a weak light on the ground floor outside the dining room door. My mother and father were coming down the stairs at this time and a stranger in mufti came up and said ‘Get down below’ he asked ‘Is there anybody in the top rooms’ He went up and brought down Bernard and Eddie McKinney from the top room. We all came down undressed. There was a man in police uniform at the drawing room door, I spoke to him and said I had a brother undergoing an operation He said ‘It is allright it is onlya raid’ I went down to the dining room and finally there was collected in that room MY father. Bernard (26). Frank (24).Patrick 22) Myself. Gerard. 15 years, Michael 12 years. and Edward McKinney.

Ther was a man there with a dust coat a trench coat with a belt on it. he said ‘Do you boys say prayers’. He shot straight before him at my father. Another man who was in uniform shot in my direction I ducked my head and was shot in the neck I fell on the floor under the floor under the table and lay there.

There were two or three shots more fired and then they went out. I thought one filled his revolver but I am not sure.

John McMahon, pictured in hospital after being shot (Freemans Journal, 28 March 1922)

Although press reports said that the three females in the house – Eliza McMahon, her daughter Lillie and niece Catherine Downey – were all held in an upstairs room, Michael told the police that his mother had also come downstairs:

“[Spelling and punctuation as per original document] I was in bed with John and Gerard on 23.24. 3.22. on third floor. I heard the glass breaking in the door and then I saw my father standing at our door, a man came into my room and ordered us down stairs. we were dressed in our night dress the man said ‘Come on. Come on’. When i w3nt down stairs I went into the dining room I saw three men o the stairs in the dark they had policemans coats on them. We were all collectd in the dining room, my father. Bernard, John, Patrick. Frank, Gerard. Eddie McKinney and myself. My mother was coming downstairs and man in the fawn coat said ‘go you back to your bed’. My mother said ‘I am going to go on down too’ She then entered the drawing room The man in the fawn coat said when we were collected ‘Did you ever say your prayers’

Eliza McMahon also made a statement to the police:

“[Spelling and punctuation as per original document] I heard a breaking of glass and I thought it was a bomb

My husband and I got up and ran downstairs from the third floor. I met a man on the stairs, he was in police uniform he had a revolver in his hand and he ordered me to return to my bed. The other occupants of the house were coming out of their rooms with other men in uniform bringing them out saying ‘get downstairs’ ‘come on’ ‘Come on’. I said ‘What do you want with them’ my husband said they are only raiding the house

John and Michael’s cousin, Mary Downey, had been staying in the house; she gave the police a description of the killers’ leader:

William Watson

Bloomfield Road, off Beersbridge Road. The Watson family lived in Bramcote Street, a side-street to the right just beyond the tram in the distance (© Old Belfast Facebook Group)

On the evening of 10 July, Watson answered a knock at the front door of the family home in Bramcote Street, near the Beersbridge Road:

Alarmed that his family was suddenly in mortal danger, Watson began a desperate hand-to-hand struggle with the intruders:

Rachel Watson saw her husband battling with the men and ran from the back door, screaming for help. At that point, Watson’s neighbour, Henry Little, having heard the commotion, came to his assistance:

Summary

A number of common features can be seen in the stories of these thirteen survivors.

The first is that some of the incidents were linked to earlier ones: the fact that Patrick McGurnaghan gave evidence in the trial of the man accused of shooting Sarah Bannon; the fact that the shootings of Francis McArdle and Bridget McCormick happened outside the same house, before the trial for the first shooting began; the very obvious connection between the attempted killing of Patrick McMahon and the actual killing of his brother and nephews.

These cases show a common urge to either intimidate witnesses from testifying or to punish those who had already done so – clearly attempts to deter potential witnesses in future trials.

The young age of many of those shot is also notable – several were still in their teens. On one hand, this – and the fact that three of these survivors were female – demonstrates the extent to which lethal violence was directed at non-combatants. But it also begs a question: where were the adult survivors who constituted the vast majority of those wounded? For some reason, the teenagers seem to have been less cowed in terms of coming forward to provide evidence.

Most of the attacks – apart from the McMahon family killings – took place in areas like Ballymacarrett and North Queen Street-York Street, where sectarian boundaries were often scrambled, sometimes consisting of no more than Catholics and Protestants living at opposite ends of the same street; John Bryson and Francis Ferron even lived directly across the street from each other.

This involvement of close neighbours increased the chances of an intended victim recognising the person shooting at them as being someone they had frequently passed in the street.

But despite the apparent strong foundation for such eyewitness testimony, often supported by that of other neighbours from the same street – and even allowing for their testimony being clouded by bitter, long-standing sectarian animosities – it is striking how often the word of eyewitnesses was trumped by alibi evidence, with the latter usually being sufficient to secure an acquittal. Neither the court nor newspaper records offer any indications of how rigorously those alibis were challenged at trial – if at all.

But almost invariably, more weight was attached to the alibi than to the recollection of the person who said they knew who was shooting at them. What that meant was that only two of these cases led to the would-be killer being found guilty and given a custodial sentence.

In the remainder, the intended victims, having recovered from their wounds and shown the courage to identify their would-be killers in court, were left to carry on with their lives as best they could in such a highly-charged context, knowing that the person who tried to kill them was still at large.

Leave a comment

References

Leave a comment