Internment and the Market, 1922

On 28th October, the Market Development Association, in conjunction with the Pangur Bán Literary and Cultural Society, will launch “Pogrom and Partition – Belfast’s Market Area 1920-22”, a local history I’ve written for them. This is an extract from that publication, which examines how the internment clause of the Special Powers Act was applied in the area. It does not pretend to be a representative sample of all those interned across the north, but rather, provides a localised case study.

Estimated reading time: 25 minutes.

The Rathbone Street raid

On 8th July 1922, a hall in Rathbone Street in the Market, which was supposedly the base of St Malachy’s Irish War Pipe Band, was raided by the Ulster Special Constabulary (USC or Specials). The hall was actually the headquarters of the IRA’s Belfast Brigade.

Rathbone Street: the building on the left with a white patch on the wall was supposedly the home of St Malachy’s Irish War Pipe Band. It was actually the HQ of the IRA’s Belfast Brigade.

The RUC wasted no time acting on the information they had uncovered: the night after the raid on the Rathbone Street hall, they swooped on the homes of the eight “specialists” who lived in the Market. Three of the men were not at the targeted addresses, but five others were arrested: James Burns in Raphael Street, brothers-in-law William Delaney and Dennis Dorrien in Riley’s Place, Peter McGurk in Stanfield Street and Peter Murray in East Street.

The Minister for Home Affairs challenged the police over the continued detention of the men, and a report from the RUC’s Criminal Investigation Department was sent:

However, DI Armstrong remained adamant that the men had all “long been under suspicion for fire-raising and other offences.”

Internees were initially held in Crumlin Road gaol

In a letter to the Ministry of Home Affairs protesting against his detention, Dodds wrote:

Despite the enormous hole which Dodds’ letter knocked in DI Armstrong’s allegations against the other men, they were all interned. Dodds was then released.

IRA internees from the Market

Although few of those initially interned in May 1922 were IRA members, over time an increasing number were – in some cases, as a result of the authorities coming back for a second bite at the cherry.

The SS Argenta: used as an internment prison in 1922

An internment order against him was signed in mid-November, but he was left under the impression he would walk free once his four months were up. He was allowed get to within seconds of liberty before his illusions were shattered:

“ When were you released?

I only got as far as the office. I was interned then, when I was released from the four months sentence.

You were released about November?

As well as the Argenta, internees were also sent to Larne Workhouse

Wrong men, wrong place, wrong time

Daniel Flannery was another resident of the Market who was interned – but he had lived in the area for precisely one day when arrested. An ex-soldier, with nine years’ service in the Inniskilling Fusiliers and five wound decorations from the Great War, Flannery had returned to his native village of Killenaule in Tipperary after being demobilised, but being an ex-serviceman, was warned by the local IRA to leave the area.

He secured work in the Government Instructional Factory in Ormeau Avenue, but was lodging in Ardoyne; wishing to live nearer his place of work, he moved to Hamilton Street in the Market on 20th May, with the intention that his wife and children would soon join him.

Joseph Hawkins from Stanfield Street was a member of C Company, the main IRA unit based in the Market; in January 1922, he had been sentenced to two months’ imprisonment for possession of ammunition. Believing him to be “a dangerous member of the I.R.A.”, the RUC raided his home on 23rd May, intending to intern him.

Internees being taken through Belfast, 22nd May 1922

Another member of C Company, Simon McStravick from Stanfield Street, had been sentenced to eighteen months’ imprisonment on 22nd May for possession of a revolver and five rounds of ammunition.

Patrick Quinn from Cromac Street was interned in even more ridiculous circumstances. Among the documents found in the Rathbone Street hall were a number of receipts for money received, signed by a “P. Quinn” – most likely Patrick Quinn from Eliza Street, who was a member of C Company. The Cromac Street Patrick Quinn was arrested on 11th August and was adamant that “my name attached to these documents is an absolute forgery”. He had a convincing case – the signatures on the receipts signed by “P. Quinn” have two distinctively different styles of handwriting and whoever signed one of them seemed to believe that the name Quinn was spelled with only one N.

In effect, Joseph Hawkins and James McStravick were interned for being the fathers of IRA members, while Patrick Quinn was interned just for having the same name as one.

Opposition to the Special Powers Act

Charlie Connolly tries to outwit the authorities

Charlie Connolly, another member of C Company, was high on the authorities’ list of targets for internment, as he had been acquitted on arms charges a few months previously.

In mid-August, an internment order against Connolly was signed. However, the RUC could not find him – his home at 95 Joy Street was raided on 15th August, again on the 18th and again on the 22nd, all without success. He remained on the run until 26th January 1923, when he was finally captured at home – he was transferred from Crumlin Road gaol to the Argenta the next day.

The following week, his wife wrote to the authorities, voicing concern that she hadn’t heard from him since his arrest; curiously, her letter was sent from 63 Joy Street. This would appear to have been part of a pre-arranged plan Connolly and his wife had devised, for around the same time, he wrote to the Ministry of Home Affairs from the Argenta:

“I am in receipt of an internment order handed to me in Belfast Prison, & intended for Charles Connolly, of 95 Joy St.

The RUC had Connolly behind bars at last and weren’t about to be taken in by a mistaken-identity ruse.

Friends in high places

Joe McPeake from Little May Street was one of the local IRA members who fled south of the border and ended up enlisting in the Free State Army, being stationed in Dundalk. By 12th March 1923, with the pogrom over and the Civil War in the south almost over, he must have judged it safe to visit his family back home and did so having got authorisation for two weeks’ leave from his superiors. Unfortunately for him, the authorities had long memories and two days after his arrival back in Belfast, the RUC arrested him.

An internment order against McPeake was drawn up, directing that he be lodged on the Argenta,  but it was never actually signed. Initially held in Crumlin Road gaol, he wrote to the Ministry of Home Affairs, claiming that prior to joining the Free State Army, he had been a peaceful, law-abiding citizen:

Humiliation

Internment regulations

The treatment of the internees in captivity has previously been documented by Denise Kleinrichert in her book, Republican Internment and the Prison Ship Argenta 1922 so it is not proposed to repeat that here. Many remained incarcerated until as late as 1924, as they refused to appear before the Advisory Committee set up to review cases, make recommendations in favour of or against release and decide what conditions should be imposed in the event of release.

One of the factors dissuading internees from applying to go before the committee was a questionnaire that was put to them at the start of each appearance; they were asked, “Are you a loyal subject of His Majesty? Do you acknowledge the authority of the Government of Northern Ireland?” as well as questions relating to membership of the IRA and IRB (or Na Fianna in the case of youths, Cumann na mBan in the case of women). Given that the answers required were obvious, the questionnaire represented a form of ritual humiliation, but only having completed it would internees then be informed of the committee’s decision about whether or not to recommend release.

Summary

The application of internment in 1922 provided an early foretaste of what the future held for those who now found themselves on the wrong side of the border.

Until the internment of a small number of members of the paramilitary Ulster Protestant Association in the autumn of 1922, the power to intern was directed exclusively at members of the nationalist community.

But although the authorities wielded internment in a discriminatory manner, they made little effort to differentiate between active Republicans and innocent nationalists. Some of those interned from the Market were indeed IRA activists. However, there were others who had no Republican involvement – the seven card-players, the fathers of IRA men, and the unfortunately-named Patrick Quinn.

While all of those interned, IRA members or otherwise, were subjected to the ritual degradation involved in appearing before the Advisory Committee, the ex-soldier Daniel Flannery was the only internee from the Market who the RUC admitted to having detained in error.

In short, this clause of the Special Powers Act was applied in a one-sided fashion, indiscriminately used against the nationalist community as a whole and – with only a single exception – the authorities’ view of themselves that they could do no wrong was so entrenched that appeals to Unionist politicians to rectify obvious injustices fell on deaf ears.

This clearly indicated the nature of the partitioned state to which nationalists were now subjected.

“Pogrom and Partition – Belfast’s Market Area, 1920-22” will be launched by the Market Development Association, in conjunction with the Pangur Bán Cultural and Literary Society, on 28th October in St George’s Market, East Bridge Street, Belfast.

References
  1. Dr Nightdub Avatar

    This comment was originally posted on 18th Oct 2022 by benmadigan (themirror.wordpress.com) but was accidentally deleted when I was doing some tidying up.

    Congratulations on excellent work and thorough research.best wishes for every success with your publication

    Like

Leave a comment

One response to “Internment and the Market, 1922”

  1. This comment was originally posted on 18th Oct 2022 by benmadigan (themirror.wordpress.com) but was accidentally deleted when I was doing some tidying up.

    Congratulations on excellent work and thorough research.best wishes for every success with your publication

    Like

Leave a comment